|
The BEST-GIS project
(Best Practice in Software Engineering and methodologies
for developing GIS applications) has been carried out in
the framework of the EU programme ESPRIT/ESSI, as an
Experience/User Network. The network was promoted by the
Association GISIG and within its policy to promote GIS as
information technologies for territorial management, and
established grouping together user, experts and suppliers
of GIS technology. It was especially addressed to steps
usually not sufficiently considered in their importance
with respect to the work-flow of the GIS process: user
interface (UI) and human computer interaction (HCI), that
are very often critical issues. It is in fact important
to consider the quality of use of GIS user interfaces as
a key-factor for GIS use efficiency and effectiveness.
The major target audience
of BEST-GIS was that of GIS end-users, both technology
users and domain specialists, the most interesting market
to expand GIS business. The project benefits expected for
the different kinds of users were:
- government and local
authorities to improve productivity and deliver
better quality GI
- companies to
establish a work process more efficient and
integrated
- professional users
to have hints on GIS applications and their
viability
- domain specialists
to use GIS more effectively and frequently
- users to get a more
precise and independent overview of GIS market
- GIS experts to
understand properly user needs
The goal of the BEST-GIS
project was to produce as a concrete and practical result
a reference book, "Guidelines for the Best Practice
in User Interface Development for GIS", based on the
experience of selected users and the contribution of key
field experts. These Guidelines were produced to help
users of GIS tools to achieve a good practice in using
these instruments for their job and hence to achieve an
added value from their systems: the focus is on
recommendations about how the usability (in the wider
sense) of GIS applications can be improved, since this
represents a recognised, important barrier for users. The
Guidelines address needs and requirements of end-user
organisations and as above said the emphasis is on GIS
user interface issues: the quality of user interfaces for
GIS needs to improve, but it should be the end-users and
not the developers who determine in which direction the
improvement should go. The process can be facilitated by
adopting the user-centered design (UCD) paradigm,
commonly applied in several engineering fields but not
very well-known in the GIS domain. At the end, the major
expected benefit for the end-users is to support a
process that sees them to progressively become real
actors in the GIS application development process. The
project partnership is convinced that the future
generation of tools and methods for design and
development of GIS products must include aspects of
user-centred design and that through the Guidelines the
Best Practice for the development of user interfaces for
GIS can be fostered.
The work performed by the
project partnership, whose outcome is synthetized in the
guidelines, included:
- data collection by
proper questionnaires
- data completion
through finalised interviews
- data analysis to
derive requirements
- synthesis of
reference frameworks to drive future applications
- technical
feasibility studies to estimate related costs
- validation
activities by workshops and on-field experiments
- dissemination
actions promoted by single partners and by the
whole network.
The network partners were
chosen for the complementary roles they can play in
realising the network policy:
- GIS users, either
final or developing GIS applications, can
effectively contribute in needs collection and
analysis and in requirement validation.
- GIS technology
providers participate in tool comparison and
assessment, and verify feasibility and cost of
the envisaged solutions.
- GIS technology
experts, including consultants and research
institutions, are involved in requirement
abstraction and normalisation, and in translating
results into education and training initiatives.
The project relevance and
impact to the participants' business is strongly related
to the nature of the single partner.
Final users are made aware that their visualisation
problems are shared by other organisations, that
reference frameworks are given to specify interface
requirements in a disciplined way, that having such
frameworks in common with other bodies improves data and
experience exchange.
Application developers derive know-how and identify new
business opportunities, can base the design and
development of geographic user interfaces on more formal
and stable need representations; moreover, the software
they produce presents higher re-usability potential.
Technology providers make available better interface
development tools, thus gaining competitive advantage; in
fact, as soon as an increasing population of users adopts
disciplined methods for interface definition, the
technological needs to satisfy are identified with higher
precision and investment can be finalised to meet them.
Finally, researchers have available a wide range of
everyday experiences to study general principles and
derive solutions. These benefits are not restricted to
the BEST-GIS partners, but they can be extended to every
organisation belonging to the above categories and
interested in geographic user interface design and
development, in the GI European Community and including
the GISIG members. Better, a wide network audience
adopting achievements of this project ensures its
stronger effectiveness and success. This network audience
is, from the beginning, extremely wide for the relations
all network partners keep up for their institutional
activities.
The project partners are:
| GISIG |
Italy |
| ANDIP |
Greece |
| CNIG |
Portugal |
| IIS |
Greece |
| University of
Girona |
Spain |
| CNR-CSITE |
Italy |
| CNR-IMA |
Italy |
| Geomatics |
Greece |
| Intergraph
Europe |
The Netherlands |
| NEXPRI |
The Netherlands |
| Provincia di
Bologna |
Italy |
| SATA |
Italy |
| Tecnopolis |
Italy |
| ACIT GmbH |
Germany |
|