![]()
Potential of GIS in Coastal Boundaries Detection and Pitfalls in Representing the Coast as a Boundary
Maria Raffaella Lamacchia (1) , Darius Bartlett (2)
(1) SAT Department, Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria
(IT)
(2) Geography Department, University College of Cork (IE)
"Boundary" and "coast" are
terms linked by a twofold relationship: on the one hand, the coastal zone
is unanimously defined as the boundary area between land, sea and air (Carter
1988); on the other, the issue of coastal boundaries definition is addressed
by the international literature as one of the most thorny subjects implied
by ICZM theories and practices (Cicin-Sain 1993). The definition of coastal
boundaries is a tricky task, since it implies the definition of the boundaries
of the boundary itself.
A review of the main definitions set up by scientists (geomorphologists, oceanographers,
biologists, ecologists, economists etc), pratictioners (politicians, administrators,
entrepreneurs, etc.) and local comunities indicates use of a wide range of
boundary types to delimit and manage the coastal zone. These include geomorphologic
boundaries, hydrogeological boundaries, biological boundaries, ecological
boundaries, legal boundaries, utilitarian boundaries, perception boundaries,
etc. Upon closer examination of these, it is possible to confirm Carter's
(1988) view that all these definitions move from a common idea: the coast
is that boundary region between sea and land made up of that portion of land
considerably affected by proximity to the sea, and that part of ocean considerably
affected by its proximity to the land.
The illustrated twofold relationship connecting the words 'coast' and 'boundary'
in turn leads towards further dual relationships between nature and humanity,
and between coastal boundaries and GIS applications. GIS tools are successfully
applied by practitioners in terrestrial and maritime boundary delineation,
for example where they are used to locate legal and conventional boundaries
established by humans, such as the limits of maritime zones defined by means
of geometrical rules according to the United Nation Convention on the Law
Of the Sea - UNCLOS (i.e.: the GIS-based Global Maritime Boundaries Database
set up and distributed by Verdian MRJ Technology Solutions), and also where
GIS are employed by scientists for detecting the limits of the natural elements
of the marine and territorial domain, such us ecosystems boundaries, catchment
basins etc. At the same time, GIS databases and tools show enormous limits
in facing the boundary nature and the associated fuzziness of coastal systems.
A number of comparatively recent theories such as Fuzzy Logic, Fractal Theory,
and Boundary Objects, along with emerging disciplines such as Landscape Ecology,
etc., support us in dealing with the boundary nature of coasts: Fuzzy Logic
theories (Zadeh 1965, 1987) help us in grasping the structural indeterminateness
of boundaries between spacial regions; Boundary Objects and the related concept
of Trading Zones (Chrisman, 1999) represent attempts at circumventing the
problems of defining objects that are inherently subject to multiple interpretations
by "agreeing to differ"; Fractal theories (Mandelbrot 1983), help
us in assessing boundaries length and shape, and in understanding their spatial
and temporal dependence; while Landscape Ecology considerations on environmental
boundaries (Forman 1995, Forman and Moore 1992) allow us to reflect on structure
and functions (habitat, conduit, filter/barrier, source and sink) of the boundaries
between landscapes elements.
The deriving conceptual model of the coast as a boundary is not easy to implement
in current geographical information systems, since these are designed to deal
almost exclusively with static, well-defined 'objects', exactly located in
space with properly defined attributes (Burrough and Frank 1996). At present
the coast is generally represented within GIS through one-dimentional or two
dimentional datasets, and in few experimental cases it is represented taking
into consideration its third (height) and fourth (temporal change) dimension
(Bartlett 1993). Even in these latter cases, however, coastal representations
are forced into the classic, crisp mode of conventional information theory
and traditional cartographic methods, since most GIS seems theoretically inadequate
to deal with objects with poorly defined boundaries, such as the coast and
its elements.
The current paper examines these issues from the specific perspective of the
territorial and regional planning professional, and considers the implications
of coastal boundary delimitation for the elaboration, communication and implementation
of international coastal zone management plans. To illustrate the problems
raised, examples are drawn from case studies of the coasts of Bari on the
Adriatic coast of sout-east Italy, and County Cork on the south-west coast
of Ireland.